How does twelve angry men show that prejudice can obscure the truth

Without the understanding of facts and evidence, he will never be able to reach for the truth so in order to reach for the truth he needs to triumph over his personal bias. These factors affect the way jurors see facts and clouds their judgement which lead jurors unable to see the truth and decide an unfair verdict.

Ultimately, in order for him to see the truth, he needs to get over his prejudiced, views and judge the defendant as an individual. Therefore, the defendant does not have a strong motive.

Personal bias takes over his thinking abilities so he cannot understand facts and evidence.

In Twelve Angry Men, how is prejudice shown to interfere in the course of justice?

The estranged relationship with his son impacts on how juror 3 sees facts and decision. This shows through when he says: In the early part of the play, juror 10 claims: This is why juror 3 refuses to listen to facts and doubts, which consequently makes him unable to see the truth.

We can see this when he says: Furthermore, due to his immense prejudice, he often confuses his prejudice with the facts of the case. This particularly applies to juror 7 who is ignorant, impatient and just wants to finish early so that he can watch the ball game. Not only prejudice obscures the truth; personal bias also obscures the truth and prevents jurors from seeing the truth.

This emphasize the problem of his prejudice is that he views the defendant not as an individual but as a representative of a group which means his perspective towards the defendant is different compared with other jurors.

In the play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose shows that prejudices can prevent jurors from seeing the truth. This is evident throughout the play as juror 10 blinded to the facts because prejudice clouds his judgement.

Prejudice Always Obscures the Truth.

From the start of the play, juror 4 votes the defendant guilty of murder, not based on facts but entirely based on prejudice and stereotyping the defendant. Due to his weak characteristics, his decision is easily influenced by other jurors and prevents him from finding the truth.

Another factor that can obscure the truth of the case is the ignorance and weak characteristics of some jurors. What they do to you. He views the defendant in the same way as he views his violent son who he wants to punish. Due to his ignorant attitude, he cannot see how facts are important in determining the truth and consequently unwilling to understand the facts.

This is why juror 10 cannot see the truth, as prejudiced takes over his thinking abilities and does not let him comprehend the facts of the case.

On the hand, juror 2 is struggles to see the truth because of his weak characteristics and lack of knowledge.

In conclusion, in the play Twelve Angry Men, not only prejudice obscures the truth but personal bias, ignorance and a weak characteristic also obscure the truth. Critical thinking Does Twelve Angry Men show that prejudice can obscure the truth?

Twelve Angry Men

Ignorance has obscured the truth without him realises it.Get an answer for 'In Twelve Angry Men, how is prejudice shown to interfere in the course of justice?' and find homework help for other Twelve Angry Men questions at eNotes.

show themselves to. Does Twelve Angry Men show that prejudice can obscure the truth? In the play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose shows that prejudices can prevent jurors from seeing the truth. Apr 03,  · Prejudice always obscures the truth.

One of my favorite movies is 12 Angry Men. Both the movie and the book show the dangers of group thinking and how we humans can easily be swayed to follow.

And no matter where you run into it, prejudice obscures the truth.' [Juror 8, page 53] Perhaps this best sums up the basis of Twelve Angry Men' by Reginald Rose.

This play is about a young delinquent on trial for the murder of his abusive father. How Does 12 Angry Men Show Prejudice Obscures the Truth? Topics: Jury, The film Twelve Angry Men serves as an excellent example demonstrating sources of power and influence tactics in leadership.

At the start, the Foreman of the Jury sits at the head of the table and assigns each juror a number.

Does Twelve Angry Men show that prejudice can obscure the truth? In the play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose shows that prejudices can prevent jurors from seeing the truth. This is evident throughout the play as juror 10 blinded to the facts because prejudice clouds his judgement.

However, besides prejudice, Rose also show personal bias, [ ].

Download
How does twelve angry men show that prejudice can obscure the truth
Rated 4/5 based on 70 review